Sunday, February 25, 2007

I've been having a lot of fun lately writing very short (less than 3000 words) stories with elements that I have never done before. It's a very good excercise, I think, as well.

In "Waiting,"I wrote a vampire memoir sort of thing--using a guy who isn't a vampire.

In "Thomas Peachtree" I wrote a wierd, Hitchhikers' Guide-esque comedy sort of thing, with myself as the first person viewpoint character.

And now in "Head," the main character is the guy who transports the heads of captured revolutionaries back to the city. I have someone who is a little on the slow side as the viewpoint, and confined the entire story to, essentially, a carraige ride.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Fast, thorough, and not interested.

That is how Journal's journey to Postscripts went via email. So I shot it off to Strange Horizons just a moment ago, and my light comedy A Tale of Thomas Peachtree will go out with monday's mail to Asimov's.
I queried Postscripts, a UK based magazine, to see if they wanted to take a look at Journal of Arthur Ravensdale. To my delight, they said yes. And then this morning, while I was getting it ready to send off, it occured to me that, while I quite enjoy writing British historical fantasy, and can fake it decently enough for an American crowd, that I was actually sending it over to, well, the UK.

So I'm a little nervous, and excited about it. We'll see how it goes!

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

I took my girlfriend to see Casino Royale last night, which was my second time. That movie is really fantastically written. As we all know, action movies are seldom known for their cleverness--and I don't mean clever lines, like normal James Bond fare, but clever plot that keeps you wondering and guessing. But man, this movie was up there with Bourne Identity. It was clearly the best Bond ever.

Casino Royale links us to the past franchise with women, guns, booze and one liners like "That last game almost killed me" that he pulls out after barely surviving getting poisoned at the card table. But the new writers for the Bond movies seem to be taking themselves a little more seriously than the past, and it accomplishes something amazing. It's far more brutal, and it concentrates on Bond as a hero who isn't necessarily the best--slick, yes, but not the best--simply, that he is unstoppable. I mean, the man gets the crap beaten out of him. In Casino Royale he is shot at, stabbed, poisoned, slashed with a machete, tortured, thrown down several flights of stairs, crashes his car, nearly drowns, hit by a couple cars, falls thirty feet, punched, kicked and thrown out of a moving vehicle. And through this whole thing, he only sleeps with one woman!

And since I tend to like writing adventure fantasy, it's a good flick to look at and ask myself, "why was that so good?" I'm really glad the Bond franchise has been ressurrected. It makes me happy inside.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Ghost Rider

I really did like the soundtrack...

Friday, February 16, 2007

On Workshopping Part 1: Getting Started

This is the first installment of my thoughts on workshopping. I’ve had a bit of practice with the matter, over a broad range of experiences, and I hope to impart a few of the things I’ve learned to you. In this series I’ll go over everything from workshopping rules to how to deal with annoying group members, to putting a group together in the first place. If anyone has any questions about writing groups, I’m always willing to give advice. You can contact me at brian at e-mcclellan dot com.

The idea of workshopping is a pretty simple one. If you’ve given your writing to friends or family, or enemies with a weak heart, and asked any of them to tell you what they thought of the work, then you have workshopped. Pretty much anyone who is an aspiring writer has workshopped at some point.

The most common method of workshopping is giving it to your mom/sister/girlfriend. This doesn’t count. She will tell you that anything short of jabber on a piece of paper is “really, really good.” The second most common is your dad/brother/boyfriend. He’s a bit easier to trust, because men don’t have that problem of being nice all the time. So they’re a lot more honest when it comes to this sort of thing.

But handing out your work to random friends and family is really quite unreliable. First off, relativse are suspect in anything they say. They probably want to maintain a decent relationship and avoid offending you. Second, regular people have set schedules and horribly busy days because they aren’t trying to write the great American novel and watch every episode of every TV show ever made. And eventually, even the most patient friend or relative is going to start avoiding you and your rabid writer’s anxiety.

That’s why we put together writing groups. A writing group is a bunch of people you can meet with on a regular basis who will all read and critique each other’s work. Basically, it is a place to workshop.

Here are a few tips for starting a writing group:

1) Find writers with similar interests. The ideal is to work with people who write what you do, (ie, mystery short stories, fantasy novels, science fiction poetry, etc). Of course, the ideal is not always reality, so work with whoever you can find. Generally, people writing genre fiction work well with other people writing genre fiction. Finding writers in the first place can be hard, but the online community is excellent for this. Either Google “writing groups” or go to places like TimeWastersGuide and surf the posts. I wouldn’t suggest simply sticking to an internet writing group, so I’m not really going to talk about those. The web can be fantastic for communication, but there’s nothing like sitting down with fellow writers to really explore your problems and depth. Although I’ve been in groups as small as three people and as large as 20 (only in an organized, educational environment, mind you ), I like to work with a writing group of between 4 and 6 people. You’ll have to judge for yourself whether you’d like to take less time per person and get more critiques, or more time and less critiques.

2) Once you’ve found a group of writers, establish a day and time you can meet. Sometimes your local library will allow you a room to meet in for 2 or 3 hours every Tuesday night, or you can use someone’s house or apartment, or even just the local Burger King. Being consistent is really important, as well as making sure that everyone is contributing to the group with their own writing and critiques all the way around. Often involving a rotating food schedule, or even just snacks, will get people to come every time.

3) Create a set of rules and etiquette for your writing group, and stick by them. My next installment will be on rules. Rules are very, very important to a writing group.

4) Get going.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Once again, I find myself making reference to a reference made to a blog.

I stumbled across this the other day. It's the blog for Edmund Schubert, editor at Intergalactic Medicine Show. In case it hasn't occured to you while reading the space between this sentence and the last, it is really good to know what is going on inside the head of a magazine editor--especially a magazine that you submit to. It gives insite and nuances that a clever writer may pick up on and be able to use in his or her future writing.

There's a particular post, if you scroll down a little ways, called Story Reading & Borrowed Blogs. Read this. It tells you what it's really like for an editor at a magazine. And when it comes to my thoughts on modern prozines, which many people have read, keep in mind that IGMS is not included with my rather brash catagorizing of... ahem... literary crap in the market. I hit up the Orson Scott Card Literary Bootcamp last summer and I have a great deal of respect for Scott's ability to judge stories by their level of interest and not by their trippy descriptions of theorized space time continualities in the fourth dimension of ancient Earth. Or whatever is being published at F&SF lately. Thusly, I have respect for whoever Scott puts in charge of his magazines.

I might mention right now that this whole blogging thing is insane. I mean, everyone has one of these, if not a proper website. I would feel almost silly if I didn't--even though I have a readership of around 8 a day.

I'm reading Steve's work right now and the submissions for my workshopping group and still trying to get a jump on my novel, but I promise to get a post up here on workshopping soon.

Oh yeah, I wrote that little vampire story I had in mind, if only to get it into my system. It's only around 2500 words and I launched it off to Abyss and Apex this afternoon. I've never done anything like it before, so I have absolutely no way to judge how good it is... at least, compared to my old stuff.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Slip Slidin' Away

I sometimes think of that Paul Simon song:

"You know the nearer your destination,
the more you're slip slidin' away..."

I queried IGMS about Hero Kyros the other day and got a response about twenty minutes ago saying that it had made it past the first round of rejections but that they decided not to publish it. Which always makes me wonder about cause and reaction and timing. Like, if I hadn't queried would I have been waiting a couple more weeks for my rejection, or did they just get a query and decide, "hey, he annoyed us, so let's just reject it now." That last one is kinda silly (I hope). Or would I have gotten a rejection tonight whether or not I had queried?

Either way, that means I now have two stories that have made it to the equivalent of the second round in three different reputable publications (Scharling Lew in F&SF and WotF, and Hero Kyros in IGMS). I guess that means I just keep juggling stories.

I shipped Sassa Hin off to IGMS by email as soon as I got the rejection. Then, when I was going to print off Hero Kyros to send to Interzone, my printer ran out of ink (after only two weeks with a new cartridge. I'm suspicious...). So that will be taken care of ASAP and I'll have all of my stories off to a venue.

I need to start on a new story for Brandon's class to submit tomorrow for writing group. I have an idea for a short, couple thousand word vampire thing-gummie that I will try to write tonight.

And on top of that, I'm going to try and start my novel soon.

Oh yeah, I'm also reading Mistborn 2 (shhh, don't tell anyone I got an advance copy), and the Pratchett book Interesting Times.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Nippon 2007

I don't know a whole lot of people who are going to Worldcon '07 in Japan at the end of this summer, but I do know several who are qualified to nominate for the Hugo and Campbell awards in the first stage of voting (hint: if I met you at LACon IV, you can nominate). Check out the Nippon ’07 website for directions and be sure to nominate you favorites.

My plugs:

Brandon Sanderson for a Campbell. This is his second year of eligibility.

Mistborn, Brandon Sanderson's second book, for a Hugo.

Isaac Stewart for a Hugo for his interior maps and artwork in Mistborn. Isaac would like you to think that this is just a joke--funny funny ha ha sort of stuff. But let's see him nominated!


While I’m at it, check out Isaac’s suddenly famous "Goodness and Badness in Science Fiction and Fantasy Cover Art" article. It has been linked by Irene Gallo (Art Director at Tor), Lou Anders (editor at Pyr) and Tobias Buckell (author). I was going to give a short review of the article, but I thought momentarily about the irony of writing an article about an article, and decided that you should just go read it yourselves.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

I just finished The Color of Magic by Terry Pratchett. It’s his first Discworld novel, and it shows in the small ways. He just hadn’t got the flow down, nor perfected the offhandedness yet, I don’t think. It’s very good. It certainly had many laugh out loud sort of moments.

The same can be said for Going Postal, which I also just finished. It was quite fun. The characters are intriguing, the premise quite amusing and not a long read at all. I never really realized that the Discworld books tend to be just a few hour reads. But then again, I didn’t have Erikson’s Malazan books to compare them to.

Good stuff. If you haven’t read them yet, do so. I’ve moved a couple other Terry Pratchett books up on my list, amongst protestations that Harry Potter or Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrel. Something else I want to get up there is The Prestige. While a good movie, I heard it was a phenomenal book.

Ah yes, and I already recieved a rejection for Sassa Hin from F&SF. Gotta give it to them. They work quick.

Monday, February 05, 2007

I finished The Journal of Arthur Ravensdale, including revisions. I'm going to submit it to the BYU short story writing contest, and then send it off to a publication. Not sure where yet, but we'll see.

I haven't heard back from IGMS for Hero Kyros. It's been about 13 weeks. That means I'm going to query them soon, see where it is.

I think that's it for the local news. Have a good one!